

|
| Lower
water levels throughout the Great Lakes—a potential
impact of global warming—could have serious consequences
for the shipping industry in port cities like Duluth. |
|
WARMING: A THREAT TO TRANSPORTATION
New study highlights global warming’s impact on the nation’s transportation systems, including Great Lakes shipping
A
report released this week by the Transportation Research Board
of the National Research Council concludes that global
warming will affect every type of transportation in the U.S.
due in part to rising sea levels, increased storm damage, and
lower lake levels. The study warns that flooded roads and weakened
bridges may be the unfortunate "wave of the future" with unchecked
global warming.
The nation’s
aging transportation system was built for local conditions based
on historical weather data. However, as new weather extremes
increase, that weather data may no longer be accurate. “The
time has come for transportation professionals to acknowledge
and confront the challenges posted by climate change and to incorporate
the most current scientific knowledge into the planning of transportation
systems,” said
Henry Schwartz Jr., chairman of the report committee.
The
National Research Council, a branch of the National Academy of
Sciences, also notes that drier conditions would result in lower
water levels throughout the Great Lakes. An expected consequence
of global warming, reduced lake levels would result in reduced
freight capacity for the shipping industry, producing a potentially
serious economic blow to the entire Midwest region. |
 |
| A
major federal loan program for coal plants has been suspended
due to increased material and labor costs and uncertainty
over future global warming pollution regulation. |
|
COAL
TAKES ANOTHER DIRECT HIT
Department of Agriculture joins banks in refusing to fund new coal plants
The federal government
announced this week that it will suspend a major loan program for
coal-fired power plants, following last month's decision
by several major banks to require coal plant developers to factor
the future cost of regulating global warming pollution into their
financing decisions. The Department of Agriculture (DOA) has provided
more than $1.3 billion in loans since 2001 but has announced it
will issue no new loans this year and likely none in 2009. The
DOA cited increased material and labor costs and uncertainty over
future regulation on global warming pollution as reasons for the
suspension.
A spokesperson
for the Rural Utilities Service, a branch of the DOA, said the
building costs for new coal plants have been rising 30 percent every year as
utilities struggle to project the future costs of mandatory controls on global
warming pollution. Those uncertainties prompted the White House’s Office
of Management and Budget to ask that any new loans to coal plants be put on hold
until the financial risks due to impending global warming regulation can be better
quantified. |
 |
| Minnesota’s decision makers have the opportunity to get tough on global warming emissions this session. |
|
WHAT
YOU CAN DO
Urge your legislators to support the Green Solutions Act
of 2008
Six Midwest
governors, including Governor Pawlenty, are already negotiating
a regional program to limit and lower global warming pollution.
With an aggressive timeline due November 15, 2008, it is critical
that Minnesota establish strong guiding principles for policies
that will help us reach the 80 percent emissions reduction goals
called for in Minnesota statute, starting in 2015. With Minnesota’s
interests in mind, a regional "cap and trade" program
to limit and lower emissions must include these principles:
- Polluters should be required to pay for their emissions allowances
in an auction, creating a pool of publicly-controlled financial
resources that can be used to ease the transition from polluting
technologies and to soften the impact of rising energy costs.
100 percent of allowances should be auctioned in a successful
cap and trade program, with the revenue accruing to the public
benefit.
- The cap
should cover as many sectors of the economy as is administratively
feasible, capping carbon "upstream," or where it enters
the economy. If emissions from a sector can be measured, they
should be limited under the cap.
- Neither
offsets nor measures that would allow more pollution at a
certain price level should be allowed. Both undermine the
ability to actually achieve emissions reductions goals and
make the program unnecessarily complicated and expensive.
The Green Solutions Act of 2008 (SF
2818/HF 3195) supports the development of a strong regional program
to limit and lower global warming emissions, provides funding
and direction to study the economic and social impacts of a cap
and trade program in Minnesota, and would retain the legislature’s
constitutional authority in adopting the regional plan currently
being negotiated by the Governor and other appointed stakeholders.
Please
contact your state legislators TODAY and urge their support
of the Green Solutions Act of 2008 (SF 2818/HF
3195). |

Support
this service! Become
a member of Fresh Energy.
Fresh
Energy works daily for smart energy policies and regulations
that enhance our economies, protect human health and communities,
restore our environment, and move us toward energy independence. www.fresh-energy.org |
|